The late Gerard Holmgren (RIP) had 9/11 figured out more than a decade ago. The link below is to a …
After the late Gerard Holmgren’s work was scrubbed from the Internet (I was able to save some of his best …
Same interview but I have added some important graphics and animations for key sections and uploaded it to YouTube as a video.
Sofia Smallstorm was kind enough to share some of her Podcast time with me a few weeks back. We discussed the 9/11 Crash Test project and the state of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
He and I have our differences but I am trying to be less of a 9/11 snob, and will share my space with Jim. This is not to say that I agree or disagree with what he writes, just sharing the work of a well respected colleague.
9/11 Who, how and Why,
Well our fundraiser failed to reach our goal and all funds were refunded. Thanks to all who supported the project.
Please watch the latest video:
HI I’m Steve De’ak, a few years ago I began a peace project I call 9/11 Crash Test. In the spirit of the popular Mythbusters show, the project plan is to raise money to rent a rocket sled test facility to answer the question once and for all whether or not it is possible for an aluminum Boeing 767 to cut through a steel skyscraper. I don’t think it is and I think I can prove it. I am what at you might call a 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist, but what I call a Concerned Grandpa. I’m tired of war without end and I want to do something to stop it.
Will a test center in the USA to allow us to conduct a test that may prove the USA was involved in 9/11? Help us raise $35,000 and we’ll find out together.
Mythbusters has been allowed to crush a car and their spinoff Myth Revolution was allowed to cut a car in half at the same test center. Our money is as good as theirs so if they can do it so can we.
The project plan is simple. Taking a section of wing from a scrapped 767, attach it to a rocket sled. Reseal the fuel tank and fill it with fuel, and at the other end of the track, fabricate some box-columns built to the specifications of the World Trade Center, and collide them together at 550 MPH, filming the results with high-speed cameras.
Our engineering team will produce a detailed analysis of how we expect the impacting bodies to behave when they are collided together at 550 MPH. This finite element analysis will be the centerpiece of the presentation we will use to formally request the use of their facilities.
This project will be conducted in two stages. This stage is to collect $35K to produce the finite element analysis. Boeing isn’t going to just give us the wing specifications for a 767 so we will need to travel to an aircraft graveyard to collect these details ourselves, the cost for a wing section from the outside of the engine to the wing tip, is estimated to be $15-20K. The task of dismantling and taking accurate measurements of the wing section will cost thousands more.
The specifications for a steel wall panel of the world trade center are in the public domain, so once we have the wing specifications our engineers will then create digital models of a wing and a wall column and present them to our engineering firm to produce the finite element analysis. The firm is sympathetic to our cause and is giving us a substantial discount of about $4K for this analysis. Our goal of $35K is to cover the costs of food, travel, lodging, licenses fees and other miscellaneous expenses.
This project will prove whether or not an aluminum jet’s wing can cut through a steel skyscraper as shown on 9/11. Whatever it proves it will be in a controlled laboratory environment that can reproduce the conditions as seen on that fateful Tuesday. If you believe the war on terror is justified, then this is the test for you. Your donation will go towards putting an end to the 9/11 conspiracies and finally the whole world will be able to work together to fight the war on terrorism. If you are a like me and you don’t want to leave your grandchildren a world where they won’t be sent to war believing impossible lies then this is the project for you. Your donation will help stop the wars and a burgeoning global police state.
If the wing section slices through the steel like a hot knife through butter as shown on 9/11, then the USA will be vindicated and all the worlds’ doubters can shut up and go home, but if the wing gets shredded by the sharp steel columns, then all the troops can come home and someone will have some explaining to do.
This project has it all – conspiracy, intrigue, suspense, physics, rockets, explosions, war and peace. Please join us at 9/11 Crash Test dot org and together we’ll launch a rocket powered revolution of awareness. Thank you.
We could use your support at the GoFundMe site:
I heard that Rosalee Grable, AKA the ‘Webfairy’ has died. Very sad news. Godspeed Rosalee.
As can be seen in the image below, the fire truck shown at 1:09 was indeed facing north. Thanks to my brother for correcting my stupid mistake. Pfeiffer’s truck is still not visible but I was wrong about the fire truck’s position. I have pulled the offending video. My apologies.
The bottom line is that Pfeiffer’s truck was not visible under the awning in the 9/11 pictures (but was there in the Naudet film) which IS an indication that it was filmed on another day. But I was totally wrong in saying that in addition to that clue the firetruck that was captured in the Naudet film was pointing in the wrong direction when compared to the one that was parked in the same location on 9/11. I mistook the two panels in the rear of the truck for reflected windows from the front. So although the Naudets apparently did film their lobby bit in advance, they did park their fire truck in the same position as the ones seen in the images captured on 9/11:
This is just another in a long string of stupid mistakes that I have made since I began researching this stuff. I once even thought the tree in front of the Pentagon was a blast hole from a missile, and said so on JREF. I included images from the MOVIE about Shanksville in my Shanksville missile video not realizing that they were not the real crater. I once thought the windows on the West side of WTC1 were “tiny” and that the whole wall was reconfigured. I once thought the towers turned to dust in mid-air, that the fires were so intense they melted steel and concrete, etc., etc., ad nausea. You name it, I have researched it and often fallen for it but thankfully I am not in this to be “right,” only to find the “truth.” Anyway, thanks Bro.
Leslie Raphael proved that the first plane impact captured by Jules Naudet was staged:
As can be seen in this short video, there were at least two versions of 9/11 captured on camera. The Naudet video portrayed the official story but a large portion of the photographic evidence from their video doesn’t match up with the videos and photographs captured that morning both before and after the collapse of the WTC.
Obviously if it had happened the way the Naudet video depicts, their video would match the rest of the photographic evidence – but they don’t match which means at least some of their footage was captured in advance. Logically the impact explosions and burning tower footage would need to be captured live, for them to be able to later edit-in a plane, so why not just shoot the whole film on the day, thereby eliminating the possibility of multiple takes screwing up the props?
I can think of only one reason why they needed to film the lobby scenes in advance, and that’s because they wanted to capture the interior before it was demolished, as interiors always are when buildings are demolished. Everything is removed, including non load-bearing floors and walls, anything that can be recycled or that can become a projectile is removed, so they would NEED to capture the lobby scenes in advance, and it seems that this is exactly what happened. This is the conclusion that Judy Wood apparently was deployed to direct her followers away from.
This is why Simon Shack and the “it’s all fake!” crowd have been working so hard do discredit ALL the photographic evidence as fake, because they knew that they left clues that would eventually be discovered. So no, it wasn’t ALL a prerecorded movie, key parts of the movie appear to have been prerecorded but most of it was filmed live as it occurred. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t staged but it definitely means it wasn’t all prerecorded in some sound stage.
Here are three videos of the same man captured from three different perspectives. Simon Shack would have us believe all three are faked. I believe he’s doing this as a way to discredit the truth movement in the eyes of the people we need to reach.