How do you explain the yellow crime scene tape in the video footage which you claim is before any first responders arrived on the scene? No eyewitnesses speak of seeing any of these “smoke machines” who arrived on scene such as Rick King and others.
It’s a shame you didn’t play Chris Chaniki’s observations in full in your video, as he arrived down there when people were already there on the scene which he said were NTSB, which you have conveniently edited out. So playing that video saying it was before is misleading people. Please notice the yellow crime scene tape on the ground, indicating people had already arrived at the scene.
Seriously, why you ignoring the evidence of that yellow tape. That yellow is the timeline of that video, yet you are ignoring it and say it was before any first responded arrived. This is untrue and you know it. Perhaps you could obtain the actual time the video footage was taken? But at the moment you are not stating a fact that it was taken before first responders arrived. As I have said you are being misleading saying this, unless this is your intentions?
Plus, why didn’t you play Chris Chaniki’s observations in full in your video? He arrived down on the scene and he says in that interview – people were already there on the scene which he said were NTSB, which you have conveniently edited out. Why would you do that?
You can’t just avoid these points, because what you are saying in your video is now considered misleading because of what you have edited out and said about the timing of the video footage without any verification of the timing of the video footage, and most likely edited Chris Chaniki’s accounts to suit what you are promoting, or trying to make it fit your theory.
Same with your Shanksville eyewitnesses claims, that they “SEEN” a missile. NO eyewitnesses are on record as seeing a missile, or missiles.
“Seriously, why you ignoring the evidence of that yellow tape. That yellow is the timeline of that video, yet you are ignoring it and say it was before any first responded arrived. ”
In the context of the smoke in the crater, the first responders had not yet gotten to that; they apparently put up the tape before dealing with the bouncing smoke machine. All you people do is nitpick like this.
“Plus, why didn’t you play Chris Chaniki’s observations in full in your video? He arrived down on the scene and he says in that interview – people were already there on the scene which he said were NTSB, which you have conveniently edited out. Why would you do that? ”
How does this change the bouncing white smoke plume?
Same with your Shanksville eyewitnesses claims, that they “SEEN” a missile. NO eyewitnesses are on record as seeing a missile, or missiles.
You know full well that she described a small white plane, no wider than her van, because that’s what she thought it looked like. The JASSM is an example of a cruise missile that fits her description. That she didn’t say it was a “missile” is beside the point. However, since you think witness reports have so much bearing on the truth, I’m still waiting for the witness accounts that describe a Directed Energy Weapon. Why won’t you hold yourself to the same standards you demand of others?
Comments
Steve,
How do you explain the yellow crime scene tape in the video footage which you claim is before any first responders arrived on the scene? No eyewitnesses speak of seeing any of these “smoke machines” who arrived on scene such as Rick King and others.
Author
Answered below. If it wasn’t a smoke machine, please explain what caused the moving plume of white smoke.
Steve,
It’s a shame you didn’t play Chris Chaniki’s observations in full in your video, as he arrived down there when people were already there on the scene which he said were NTSB, which you have conveniently edited out. So playing that video saying it was before is misleading people. Please notice the yellow crime scene tape on the ground, indicating people had already arrived at the scene.
Regards,
Mark.
Author
Again, how does this change the bouncing white smoke plume?
Why won’t you answer my questions?
I am pretty sure that if you had something to say, you would have said it by now.
Steve,
Seriously, why you ignoring the evidence of that yellow tape. That yellow is the timeline of that video, yet you are ignoring it and say it was before any first responded arrived. This is untrue and you know it. Perhaps you could obtain the actual time the video footage was taken? But at the moment you are not stating a fact that it was taken before first responders arrived. As I have said you are being misleading saying this, unless this is your intentions?
Plus, why didn’t you play Chris Chaniki’s observations in full in your video? He arrived down on the scene and he says in that interview – people were already there on the scene which he said were NTSB, which you have conveniently edited out. Why would you do that?
You can’t just avoid these points, because what you are saying in your video is now considered misleading because of what you have edited out and said about the timing of the video footage without any verification of the timing of the video footage, and most likely edited Chris Chaniki’s accounts to suit what you are promoting, or trying to make it fit your theory.
Same with your Shanksville eyewitnesses claims, that they “SEEN” a missile. NO eyewitnesses are on record as seeing a missile, or missiles.
Please address the points!
Mark.
Author
“Seriously, why you ignoring the evidence of that yellow tape. That yellow is the timeline of that video, yet you are ignoring it and say it was before any first responded arrived. ”
In the context of the smoke in the crater, the first responders had not yet gotten to that; they apparently put up the tape before dealing with the bouncing smoke machine. All you people do is nitpick like this.
Are you, or are you not biased?
Author
“Plus, why didn’t you play Chris Chaniki’s observations in full in your video? He arrived down on the scene and he says in that interview – people were already there on the scene which he said were NTSB, which you have conveniently edited out. Why would you do that? ”
How does this change the bouncing white smoke plume?
Author
Mark Conlon wrote:
You know full well that she described a small white plane, no wider than her van, because that’s what she thought it looked like. The JASSM is an example of a cruise missile that fits her description. That she didn’t say it was a “missile” is beside the point. However, since you think witness reports have so much bearing on the truth, I’m still waiting for the witness accounts that describe a Directed Energy Weapon. Why won’t you hold yourself to the same standards you demand of others?