Shanksville: Mark Conlon’s analysis of my analysis

Published by Steve De'ak on

For posterity I’ve decided to post the work of my detractors.  Here’s Mark Conlon explaining where I’m wrong about Shanksville.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/v44XeiOQcYUr/

Categories: 9/11 Research and Analysis

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

9/11 Research and Analysis

Window-people and the windowpanes.

The people seen hanging out of the windows on 9/11, and the jumpers, are a sensitive subject for everyone, truthers and true believers alike.  There are basically two camps of beliefs: In my experience there Read more…

9/11 Research and Analysis

Simon Shack and Steve De’ak to discuss 9/11 fakery on Fakeologist’s show, Feb. 12 at 11:00 PST.

Archive here:https://fakeotube.com/video/5660/fak671-simon-shack-and-steve-deak?channelName=Fakeologist When it comes to 9/11 research, Simon Shack’s classic, “September Clues,” was a real eye opener for me. Whether or not you believe the planes were real planes (reinforced or not), “CGI,” or Read more…

9/11 Research and Analysis

Fakeologist and Boogieman discuss why Simon Shack is wrong

Ab Irato – or Fakeologist – was my first interview. If I recall, I was also his first interview. Here is a video, ten years later, where a listener going by the moniker of “Boogieman,” Read more…