9/11 Research and Analysis Shanksville: Mark Conlon’s analysis of my analysis By Steve De'ak on Friday, February 15, 2019 For posterity I’ve decided to post the work of my detractors. Here’s Mark Conlon explaining where I’m wrong about Shanksville. https://www.bitchute.com/video/v44XeiOQcYUr/ Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Related Steve De'ak Previous Post 9/11 – Duty of Memory Next Post 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality Related Posts 9/11 Research and Analysis The Writing of Gerard Holmgren Gerard Holmgren (RIP) explains the “No Planes” conclusion – with subtitles By Steve De'ak on Monday, April 25, 2022 9/11 Research and Analysis The Paper By Steve De'ak on Sunday, April 17, 2022 9/11 Research and Analysis Costs of War By Steve De'ak on Friday, September 11, 2020 9/11 Crash Test 9/11 Research and Analysis Video: What is Shanksville But a Fable Agreed Upon? By Steve De'ak on Thursday, September 10, 2020 9/11 Research and Analysis Squirm, Skeptics, Squirm By Steve De'ak on Saturday, January 18, 2020
9/11 Research and Analysis The Writing of Gerard Holmgren Gerard Holmgren (RIP) explains the “No Planes” conclusion – with subtitles By Steve De'ak on Monday, April 25, 2022
9/11 Crash Test 9/11 Research and Analysis Video: What is Shanksville But a Fable Agreed Upon? By Steve De'ak on Thursday, September 10, 2020