Sick and Tired of War Without End

Sick and Tired of War Without End

 

English version below the French:

Le texte ci-dessous est un projet de copie d’un message à mes amis François Sebesi et François Roby, qui interviendront lors d’une conférence française sur le 11 Septembre,
11 SEPTEMBRE 2001 – DEVOIR DE MÉMOIRE

Preuves techniques et scientifiques de l’effroyable imposture.

http://aitia.fr/erd/paroles-de-francois-prelude/

27 août 2018

Bonjour, Je suis Steve De’ak, j’envoie mes salutations à mes amis, François Roby et François Sebesi, aux personnes présentes à la conférence, 11 SEPTEMBRE 2001 – DEVOIR DE MÉMOIRE et aux chercheurs de Vérité sur le 11 Septembre partout dans le monde.

Cela fait dix-sept ans, mais je peux me rappeler exactement où je me trouvais, et ce que je faisais, lorsque le World Trade Center a été attaqué. Je suis sûr que la plupart d’entre nous le peut. Pour ceux d’entre vous qui étaient trop jeunes pour se souvenir, 2001 était une époque où les téléphones cellulaires n’étaient pas équipés de caméras, Internet et le « réseaux sociaux » était du texte uniquement dans un espace de discussion et YouTube rien de plus qu’une lueur dans « l’oeil a tout voir » des services de renseignement. Par rapport à aujourd’hui, en 2001, les ressources en ligne étaient limitées.

Choc et sidération

Pour moi, je roulais pour aller travailler quand j’ai entendu les nouvelles, quand je suis arrivé, je me souviens, au début, on ne savait pas ce qui était arrivé. Comme une scène d’un film catastrophe, une explosion était sortie de la tour nord du World Trade Center avec un trou béant, grimaçant sur son côté, crachant des nuages de poussière, du papier et de la fumée. Comme les télévisions ont concentré leurs caméras sur la face nord de la Tour Nord, les premiers rapports de témoins nous parvenaient ; certaines personnes ont dit que c’était une bombe, certains ont dit que c’ était un petit avion, et certaines personnes ont dit qu’ils ont vu des missiles, mais CNN a choisi de suivre ce que l’un de leurs dirigeants, Sean Murtagh, a déclaré, en affirmant que c’était un grand jet commercial ; nous fournissant un indice quant à la façon dont la ruse a été accomplie. En utilisant la puissance de la suggestion, ils préparaient le terrain pour le viol de nos sens, et lançaient un défi à notre santé mentale collective, qui nous attendait « au coin de la rue» quand ils ont diffusé ce que nous avons pensé, être un avion volant au travers d’un bâtiment en acier.

Choc et stupeur est un terme utilisé pour décrire une stratégie militaire de domination rapide d’un ennemi en appliquant une force écrasante. Le 11 Septembre l’ennemi, c’était « nous le peuple », et la force écrasante était la puissance de feu de la machine de propagande occidentale. C’est à ce moment que les pouvoirs en place ont déclaré la guerre au reste d’ entre nous, et comme cela est souvent le cas en temps de guerre, le bombardement initial avait pour but de nous imposer la soumission et d’éliminer toute chance de résistance. Sous un bombardement acharné, toute la journée, d’images terrifiantes, et de descriptions, des horreurs se produisant dans le sud de Manhattan, nous avons été pour un temps un mastic malléable et prévisible dans les mains des propagandistes. Aujourd’hui cependant, avec l’avantage d’une décennie et demi de recul, dans les émissions archivées de la matinée du 11 Septembre, nous pouvons voir la facilité avec laquelle nous avons été trompés.

Les télévisions ont ignoré les rapports des témoins dans la rue, en faveur de l’histoire racontée par leurs dirigeants, et parce qu’il y avait seulement une courte période de 18 minutes entre l’explosion à la Tour du Nord, et les boules de feu « en direct » du vol UA 175, nous n’avons pas eu le temps de remettre en question quoi que ce soit.

En témoignage de l’efficacité de la propagande, encore à ce jour, ce qui semble être la grande majorité de l’humanité est désespérément envoûtée par ce qui équivalait à un effet spécial bon marché, présenté avec un visage sérieux par des figures de proue du gouvernement et des médias, qui sont prétendument au service de « nous le peuple », mais qui, en fait, se nourrissaient et manipulaient notre confiance (et en notre foi en l’autorité qui nous avait été inculquée) pour nous faire croire des choses impossibles.

Leur but apparent était de nous forcer à choisir entre le maintien de notre raison, en considérant le 11-Septembre pour l’escroquerie qu’il est, ou suivre la foule et se fondre dans ce que le regretté Gérard Holmgren a appelé la« sénilité intellectuelle ». Malheureusement, le monde a choisi la dernière option, avec comme fruits de notre apathie commune et de l’ignorance volontaire un Etat policier mondial en plein essor, la guerre sans fin, et un record honteux de pillages, d’assassinats et de tortures.

Au fil du temps, le brouillard de la guerre dissipé, les gens ont commencé à réaliser que quelque chose allait très mal avec l’histoire officielle, et beaucoup se sont tournés par « confort » vers le Mouvement pour la Vérité sur le 11 Septembre, en pensant que au moins quelqu’un faisait quelque chose à ce sujet. Nous pouvions voir de l’argent collecté, des pétitions signées, des procès ouverts, des panneaux d’ affichage utilisés, et même Richard Gage sur C Span, mais si vous mettez de côté la rhétorique et que l’on examine les résultats de leur militantisme, tout ce que le mouvement pour la vérité a accompli est d’empêcher une discussion ouverte sur les faits.

Trouver la vérité, la vérité réelle, de ce qui est arrivé ce jour-là, est presque impossible en suivant le travail du mouvement pour la vérité. Les dirigeants ont tout simplement ignoré des preuves qui contredisent leurs arguments et ils continuent comme s’ils ne les avaient jamais vus.

Ils discutent publiquement entre eux, comme si seules leurs hypothèses avaient du poids, tout en pointant un doigt hypocrite les uns sur les autres (et sur tout le monde), en accusant chacun d’être un infiltré. Je ne suis pas expert, mais c’est exactement ce que j’attendrais de faux prophètes dans un faux mouvement pour la paix ; je soupçonne que c’est ce à quoi ressemble une opposition sous contrôle.
À partir de maintenant, il devrait être devenu évident qu’exposer la vérité n’a jamais été leur but ; que leur intention a toujours été de diviser pour mieux régner. Une bonne propagande vise toujours l’émotion, pas la raison, qui révèle pourquoi les chercheurs de vérité se mettent souvent en colère quand quelqu’un remet en question quoi que ce soit que nous croyons s’être produit le 11 Septembre, parce que nous y sommes émotionnellement attaché. Mais la vérité est ce qu’elle est, qu’elle soit d’accord avec nous, ou avec ce que vend le mouvement pour la vérité sur le 11 Septembre. Si la vérité est le but, elle ne devrait être une menace pour personne, ou comme Flannery O’Connor l’a dit, « La vérité ne change pas en fonction de notre capacité à la maîtriser émotionnellement ».

La réalité est que je ne peux être sûr que de moi. Je sais que je ne suis pas sur la liste des salariés de quiconque. Mais quand j’ai examiné les preuves, je suis arrivé à une conclusion complètement différente de celle du reste du mouvement pour la vérité. Personne ne devrait me croire sur parole ; je vous exhorte tous à scruter mes recherches et conclusions, attentivement, et je souhaite que les dirigeants du mouvement de la vérité disent la même chose. Aucun d’entre nous ne devrait accorder de valeur à une déclaration sans avoir préalablement examiné les preuves par lui-même, mais nous avons été trop occupés à élever nos familles et vivre nos vies, pour nous permettre plus qu’un coup d’œil rapide sur le 11 Septembre.

Le tri des indices sans issue et des fausses pistes, exige un engagement de temps dont la plupart d’entre nous ne dispose pas. Le fait est que très peu de gens sont capables de faire des recherches, alors nous faisons confiance aux autres pour nous apporter la vérité ; quelque chose que nous avons été formés à faire depuis que nous étions assez vieux pour lire les nouvelles dans les journaux quotidiens. Nous ne sommes pas des êtres immortels avec un temps sans fin, le plus souvent ; la façon dont nous arrivons à « la vérité » est de croire tout ce qui nous convient.
Cela explique pourquoi les chercheurs de vérité ne considèrent presque jamais que la meilleure façon de contrôler l’opposition est de la conduire. Cela illustre aussi pourquoi il est si difficile pour nous de reconnaître que les dirigeants de « la contestation » sont plus intéressés à nous garder occupés à des harangues et des querelles intestines, alors que la machine de guerre fonctionne, plutôt que d’exposer les mensonges qui ont permis de commencer les guerres.

Nous nous mentons à nous-mêmes. Vous savez si oui ou non vous êtes honnête dans votre enquête, et vous savez comment vérifier si oui ou non le leader que vous suivez est honnête aussi. Depuis l’école primaire, nous avons appris que la meilleure façon d’acquérir des connaissances est d’utiliser la méthode scientifique, il est grand temps pour le mouvement pour la vérité sur le 11 Septembre de l’appliquer au 11 Septembre, de prouver, ou d’infirmer, quelque chose ; n’importe quoi. Toute personne qui veut sincèrement la vérité doit examiner toutes les hypothèses auxquelles elles sont attachées et se demander si elle peut résister à un examen scrupuleux. Si elle ne peut pas alors cela ne peut pas être la vérité.

Exprimez-vous.
Exposez les mensonges.
Arrêtez les guerres.

Heureusement, le vernis s’écaille, et la vérité fait surface. Grâce au travail des personnes comme François Sebesi et François Roby, la méthode scientifique fait un retour dans la recherche sur le 11 Septembre. Je connais ces deux messieurs à travers un projet de paix sur lequel nous avons collaboré, appelé « 9/11 Crash Test ».

Si vous n’en avez pas entendu parler , vous pouvez remercier le 9/11 Truth Movement pour cela ; nous ne sommes pas sous leur contrôle, par conséquent, ils sont obligés de nous ignorer.

Dans l’esprit de l’émission « Mythbusters », l’idée est de monter une section réelle d’une aile de Boeing 767 sur un chariot à fusée, et de le faire rentrer en collision à plus de 550 MPH (885 km/h) avec des colonnes en acier construites selon les mêmes spécifications que celles du World Trade Center, au point d’impact. Mes collègues et moi tentons de prouver ou d’ infirmer une hypothèse, ce qu’aucun autre groupe pour la vérité ose tenter.
En utilisant la physique et l’expérimentation empirique, nous pouvons prouver que les impacts d’avions ont été inventés par les media, mais prouver ce qui ne s’est pas produit est seulement une partie du projet ; si nous ne parvenons jamais à obtenir du temps de test pour le chariot à fusée, nous allons aussi essayer de prouver ce qui s’est produit. Nous allons le faire en utilisant les preuves photographiques que nous avons tous à notre disposition, pour observer les dégâts tels que constatés.

Une véritable enquête scientifique commence par examiner les éléments de preuve sur les lieux du crime, mais ce sont ces preuves que le mouvement pour « la vérité » ne touchera jamais.
De toute évidence, si les groupes populaires sont sous contrôle, alors, logiquement, on trouvera la vérité la où ils craignent de marcher ; les trous d’impact sur les trois sites du 11 Septembre. Identifiez la façon dont ils ont été découpés, et vous identifierez les suspects les plus probables.

9/11 Crash Test propose de détourner une partie infime des millions de dollars que les groupes du mouvement pour la vérité américains acceptent, pour prouver une fois pour toutes, si ce qu’on nous a montré à la télévision était un événement réel. Pour une fraction de ce que AE911T recueille chaque année, nous pourrions éliminer tout à fait la controverse sur l’absence d’avions et du même élan, éliminer un obstacle majeur à unir l’opposition sous une seule bannière.

Saisir cette occasion démontrerait au monde que les groupes disparates pour la vérité sur le 11 Septembre peuvent travailler ensemble pour appliquer la méthode scientifique et résoudre des problèmes, ce qui changerait instantanément l’image d’un mouvement de cinglés portant des entonnoirs sur la tête, à un mouvement de gens militants sérieusement pour la paix, capables de remettre en cause le statu quo.
Personnellement, je ne vois pas de problème plus important à résoudre que la guerre sans fin au terrorisme née le 11 Septembre.
Notre projet, 9/11 Crash Test, est un exemple d’idée qui pourrait mettre un terme à l’impasse, et à l’inertie, du mouvement pour la vérité sur le 11 Septembre. Je suis sûr qu’il y a d’autres idées, et cette conférence est l’endroit idéal pour en discuter, mais de continuer à signer les mêmes pétitions, et en suivant les mêmes dirigeants en tournant en rond, est de la folie. Quelque chose doit changer.
Il y a Six ans 9/11 Crash Test a publié sa première vidéo intitulée « Fatigué des guerres sans fin ». Dans cette vidéo, je dis que si vous êtes comme moi, et ne voulez pas laisser à vos petits-enfants un monde où ils peuvent être envoyés à la guerre en croyant à des mensonges impossibles, « nous le peuple » devons travailler ensemble pour exposer la vérité. Nous sommes en 2018, et cet anniversaire marque une étape sinistre (qui se dessine comme une pierre tombale), que le Mouvement pour la Vérité doit considérer. Toute personne née après le 11 Septembre 2001 peut être enrôlé dans l’armée américaine pour combattre dans des guerres, sur la base d’un mensonge énoncé avant leur naissance.

Si ce cauchemar orwellien n’est pas le genre de monde que vous voulez laisser à vos enfants, il appartient à chacun d’entre nous de dire la vérité. Cela peut être difficile au début, mais vous n’êtes pas seul ; 9/11 Crash Test vous soutient.

Il y a dix-sept ans, personne ne savait ce qui s’était passé, mais ces jours sont révolus. Aujourd’hui, nous pouvons prouver ce qui est arrivé, et la seule chose sur notre chemin est le mouvement pour la « vérité ». Merci encore, à François Roby, François Sebesi et aux personnes concernées dans le monde entier, pour donner une chance à la vérité (et à la paix).

Très cordialement,

Steve De’ak

 

Sans subtitles:

Hello, I’m Steve De’ak, sending greetings to my friends, Francois Roby and Francois Sebesi, to attendees of the conference, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 – DUTY OF MEMORY, and to 9/11 Truth Seekers everywhere.

It has been seventeen years, but I can remember exactly where I was, and what I was doing, when the World Trade Center was attacked.  I’m sure most of us can.  For those of you who were too young to remember, 2001 was a time when cell phones didn’t have cameras, when Internet “social media” was a text-only chat room, and when YouTube was nothing more than a gleam in the all-seeing eye of the Intelligence services.  Compared to today, in 2001, online resources were limited.

Shock and Awe

For me, I was driving to work when I heard the news, and when I arrived, I recall, at first, no one knew what happened.  Like a scene from a disaster movie, an explosion had left the North Tower of the World Trade Center with a gaping, grinning hole in its side, belching clouds of dust, paper and smoke.  As the networks focused their cameras on the north face of the North Tower, the first witness reports rolled in; some people said it was a bomb, some said it was a small plane, and some people said they saw missiles, but CNN chose to lead with what one of their executives, Sean Murtagh, said, which was that it was a large commercial jet; providing a clue as to how the ruse was accomplished.  Using the power of suggestion, they were setting the stage for the assault on our senses, and the challenge to our collective sanity, which was just around the corner, when they broadcast what we thought, was a plane flying through a steel building.

Shock and Awe is a term used to describe a military strategy of rapidly dominating an enemy by applying overwhelming force.  On 9/11 the enemy was We the People, and the overwhelming force was the firepower of the Western propaganda machine.  It was then that the Powers that Be declared war on the rest of us, and as is so often the case in war, the initial bombardment was intended to beat us into submission and eliminate any chance of resistance.  Under a relentless, days-long barrage of terrifying images, and descriptions, of the horror taking place in lower Manhattan, we were predictable putty in the propagandists’ hands; for a while. Today though, with the benefit of a decade and a half of hindsight, in the archived broadcasts from the morning of September 11th it can be seen how easily we were fooled.

The networks disregarded the reports from witnesses on the street in favor of the story told by their executives, and because there was only a short 18-minute period between the explosion at the North Tower, and the “live” shots of UA 175, we didn’t have time to question anything.  As a testament to the efficacy of propaganda, still to this day, what appears to be the vast majority of humanity is hopelessly spellbound by what amounted to a cheap special-effect, delivered with a straight face by Government and Media figureheads that allegedly have the best interests of We the People in mind, but which were in fact preying on, and manipulating our trusting nature (and indoctrinated faith in authority), into making us believe impossible things.

Their apparent goal was to force us into choosing between maintaining one’s intellect, by seeing 9/11 for the fraud it is, or following the crowd and fading into what the late Gerard Holmgren called, “Intellectual Senility.” Unfortunately, the world chose the latter, with the fruits of our shared apathy and willful ignorance being a burgeoning global police state, endless war, and a shameful record of looting, murder and torture.

As time passed and the fog of war lifted, people started to realize something was seriously wrong with the official story, and many turned to the 9/11 Truth Movement for comfort, thinking at least someone was doing something about it.  We could see money being raised, petitions being signed, court cases being opened, billboards being displayed, and even Richard Gage on CNN, but if you set aside the rhetoric and examine the results of their activism, all the truth movement has accomplished is to prevent an open discussion of the facts.

Finding the truth, the actual truth, about what happened that day, is almost impossible by following the work of the truth movement.  The leaders will simply ignore evidence that contradicts their arguments and carry on like they never saw it.  They then publicly argue among themselves, as if only their hypotheses carry any weight, while pointing a hypocritical finger at each other (and everyone else), for being a spy.  I am no expert, but this is exactly what I would expect from false prophets in a bogus peace movement; I suspect this is what controlled opposition looks like.

By now it should be obvious exposing the truth was never the goal; that their intent all along was to divide and conquer us.  Good propaganda always targets emotion, not reason, which reveals why truth seekers are often angered when someone challenges whatever it is we believe happened on 9/11, because we are emotionally attached to it.   But the truth is what it is, whether or not it agrees with us, or with what the 9/11 Truth Movement is selling.  If the Truth is the goal, it should be a threat to nobody, or as Flannery O’Connor put it, “The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it emotionally.”

The reality is I can only be sure about me.  I know I’m not on anyone’s payroll, but when I examined the evidence I came to a completely different conclusion than the rest of the truth movement.  Nobody should take my word for anything; I urge everyone to scrutinize my research, and conclusions, carefully, and I wish the leaders of the truth movement would say the same.  None of us should take at face value any claim without first examining the evidence for ourselves, but we have been too busy raising families, and living our lives, to afford more than a cursory glance at 9/11.  Sorting through the dead-end clues, and false leads, requires a time commitment most of us aren’t prepared for.  The fact is very few people are able to do any research at all, so we trust other people to bring us the truth; something we have been trained to do since we were old enough to read the news in the daily papers.  We aren’t immortal beings with endless time, so more often than not; the way we arrive at ‘the truth’ is to believe whatever suits us.

This explains why truthers almost never consider the best way to control the opposition is by leading it.  It also illustrates why it is so difficult for us to recognize that the leaders of the opposition are more interested in keeping us occupied with red-herrings and infighting, while the war machine marches on, than they are with exposing the lies that started the wars to begin with.

We’re lying to ourselves.  You know whether or not you’re being honest in your investigation, and you know how to verify whether or not the leader you’re following is being honest, too.  Since grade school, we were taught the best way to acquire knowledge is by using the scientific method, and it is long past time for the 9/11 Truth Movement to apply it to 9/11, to prove, or disprove, something; anything.  Anyone that sincerely wants the truth needs to examine whatever 9/11 hypothesis they’re attached to, and ask themselves if it can withstand such scrutiny.  If it can’t then it can’t be the truth.

Speak out.  Expose the lies.  Stop the wars.

Fortunately, the veneer is wearing thin, and the truth is rising.  Thanks to the work of people, such as Francois Sebesi and Francois Roby, the scientific method is making a comeback in 9/11 research.   I know these two gentlemen through a peace project on which we’ve been collaborating called, “9/11 Crash Test.”  If you haven’t heard about us, you can thank the 9/11 Truth Movement for that; we are not under their control, consequently they are forced to ignore us.

In the spirit of the “Mythbusters” show, the idea is to mount a real section of wing from a 767 on a rocket sled, and collide it at 550+ MPH with steel box columns built to the same specifications of the World Trade Center, at the point of impact.  My colleagues and I are attempting to prove, or disprove, a hypothesis, something no other truth group dares to attempt.  By using physics, and empirical experimentation, we can prove the jet impacts were faked by the media, but proving what didn’t happen is only part of the project; if we ever do manage to get rocket-sled test center time, we will also attempt to prove what did happen.  We will do this by using the photographic evidence we all have at our disposal, to recreate the damage as found.

A genuine forensic investigation begins with examining the evidence at the crime scene, but this is evidence the truth movement won’t touch.  Obviously, if the popular groups are under control, then logically the truth will be found where they fear to tread; the impact holes at all three 9/11 sites.  Identify how they were cut, and you will identify the most likely suspects.

9/11 Crash Test proposes diverting a tiny portion of the millions of dollars the American truth groups accept, to prove once and for all, whether or not what we were shown on television depicted a real event.  For a fraction of what AE911T collects every year, we could eliminate the “no planes” contention altogether, and in the process, eliminate a major hurdle in uniting the opposition under one banner.  Seizing this opportunity would demonstrate to the world that the disparate 9/11 Truth Groups can work together to apply the scientific method to solve problems, which would instantly change the public impression of the movement from one of tinfoil-hat wearing nutters, to one of serious peace activists, capable of challenging the status quo.  Personally, I can think of no greater problem that needs solving than 9/11’s endless War on Terror.

Our project, 9/11 Crash Test, is just one example of an idea that can stop the impasse, and inertia, of the 9/11 Truth Movement.  I’m sure there are other ideas, and this conference is the perfect place to discuss them, but to continue signing the same petitions, and following the same leaders in circles, is madness.  Something needs to change.

Six years ago 9/11 Crash Test released its first video entitled, “Tired of War without End.”  In that video I said that if you’re like me, and don’t want to leave your grandchildren a world where they can be sent to war believing impossible lies, then We the People must work together to expose the truth.  It is now 2018, and this anniversary marks a grim milestone (that looms like a tombstone), for the 9/11 Truth Movement to consider.  Anyone born after September 11, 2001 will be able to enlist in the US Military to fight in the wars, borne of a lie, told before they were born.   If this Orwellian nightmare isn’t the kind of world you want to leave to your children, then it is up to each of us to speak the truth.  It can be difficult at first, but you’re not alone; 9/11 Crash Test has your back.

Seventeen years ago no one knew what happened, but those days are over.  Today we can prove what happened, and the only thing standing in our way is the 9/11 Truth Movement.   Thanks again, to Francois Roby, Francois Sebesi, and to concerned people the world over, for giving the truth (and peace), a chance.

Very Sincerely,

 

Steve De’ak

 

 

A Different Take on Shanksville

I was hoping to include Shanksville in the Trump PDF but they nixed it.  This is what I had in mind:

A Different Take on Shanksville

Fortune favors the audacious.
~Desiderius Erasmus

If you have ever had the pleasure of sitting on a jury during a trial you will know that the act of identifying who had the motive, means and opportunity to commit the crime is a necessary step in narrowing-down the list of suspects. Investigating the crime of 9/11 should be no different and although much has been written about the World Trade Center, in my opinion the easiest way to expose who was behind 9/11 is by plucking the low-hanging fruit of Shanksville.

 

Motive

On 9/11 we are told four planes were hijacked.  Osama bin Laden, the alleged mastermind, chose to target the World Trade Center because the Twin Towers were synonymous with American corporate power.  Some people believe that it was more than simple hatred for the Great Satan that motivated bin Laden; that he also resented the Islamic flavor of Architect Minoru Yamasaki’s buildings, so the WTC had to go. [i]

Bin Laden despised the US Military presence in the holy land of Saudi Arabia where they remained after repulsing the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, so targeting the Pentagon was a natural choice.[ii]

Many people believe the fourth plane, UA Flight 93, was aiming for the White House but it was thanks to the heroism of the civilians aboard that it was forced-down rather than to allow it to reach its target.[iii]  In this context the Shanksville location for the crash was just an accident, which is believable from the perspective of the official story; the passengers on the hijacked flight had heard about the WTC and Pentagon attacks and surmised that like Flights AA 11, UA 175 and AA 77 UA 93 was going to be used as a missile, so they made the decision to fight back.  In the confusion of the onboard struggle the alleged hijackers lost control of the plane, which means it could have gone down anywhere e.g. into a neighborhood, a building or a freeway, but by the grace of God it crashed into an abandoned strip mine in rural Pennsylvania, harming no one on the ground.   If terrorism was the motive, then for the perpetrators the UA 93 hijacking was a failure.

The story of average Americans who fought to the death in defense of America’s capital digs right into our emotions, just like all good propaganda does. It is a compelling tale of extraordinary circumstances where the true grit that makes America great triumphed; a warm and fuzzy narrative that could only have been written by Hollywood.   In my opinion the simple reason Shanksville was necessary was that without Flight 93’s chapter the 9/11 story only depicted corporate and military power under attack, and for folks on the street who have no sympathy for corporations and who think the military can take care of itself there was no guarantee the public would be outraged enough to support a never-ending “War on Terror.”  But by including Flight 93, America itself became the target, and no one messes with Baseball, Mom and Apple Pie without paying the price.  If war was the motive then Shanksville sealed the deal.

 

Means

A quick examination of the scene of the crime shows two shallow gashes extending at opposite directions from a deeper central crater. Had I never been told that a plane crashed there, I would never have considered such a thing, and in fact some of the first people to the scene made the same observation.[iv]

I grew up as a red-blooded American male which means I was armed to the teeth at a young age, so I recognized in that odd-shaped crater in Shanksville the smoking holes in the ground I used to make as a kid in Alaska where I had relatively easy access to firearms, black powder and explosives some legal and some not.  A quick Internet search for impact craters brought me to the NASA Ames research facility images.[v]  In those photos I immediately noticed something familiar, and I think you will too.  By mirroring them it’s easier to see what I mean (lower left.)  The photo on the lower right is alleged to be the impact crater from a 757, but according to NASA these sorts of gashes are reproducible with projectiles striking at trajectories of less than ten degrees from horizontal.

 

I know from researching every high-speed airplane crash in history that none of the craters at those crashes looked anything like Shanksville and unlike Shanksville all other high-speed crash sites included easily identifiable debris all around the impact crater.   The Shanksville crater was unique as a plane crash, but it’s not so unique when viewed for what NASA says it was, and if NASA is right then it can be reproduced.

I don’t have a rocket sled test center handy, nor do I have a hypervelocity gun, but anyone who has ever seen a hole made by a bullet ricochet should recognize the same gash in those ‘wing’ imprints, and it didn’t take me long to reproduce smaller versions using sling shots, air guns, bullets and fireworks.[vi]  The fact is anyone with two projectiles and an explosive can reproduce the Shanksville crater on a smaller scale anytime they wish. The same shape will be produced regardless of the size of the projectiles. It is easier to produce with the projectile striking in the center and then ricocheting out than it is to produce with the projectile striking from the outside and burrowing into the middle, but it works either way, outside-in or inside-out.  All that’s needed after creating the gashes is to detonate an explosive to create the central crater.  Predictable and reproducible are hallmarks of the scientific method but don’t take my word for it, anyone who doesn’t believe me can try it for themselves (but be careful!)

Being reproducible with bullets and fireworks is one thing, but the Shanksville crater measured somewhere around 120 feet from “wingtip to wingtip” with the central hole measuring about 30 feet wide and 15 feet deep, so to get an idea how big of a projectile we’re talking about, crater sizes produced by bombs depend on the size and depth of the explosive in the ground as well as the soil composition, but in general a bomb containing about 200 lbs of explosives makes a crater of about the same size as that found at Shanksville.[vii]

There are very few weapons that can accomplish it, only cruise missiles from what I can tell.  Although some witness reports matched the government’s story, some witnesses reported hearing and seeing missiles.[viii][ix] Not all of them can be right.

As an example of what could do the deed, the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile, or JASSM, is extremely accurate and carries a 900 lb. dense-metal, or dense-metal ballast warhead that measures 12×60 inches.  This warhead is designed for punching through hardened targets such as concrete bunkers with or without detonating therefore the hard, dry, rocky soil of Shanksville would be child’s play, easily accounting for the wing gashes.[x]  240 lbs. of that warhead is explosive so it can also account for the central crater.  The JASSM used off-the-shelf components from other tried-and-true weapons systems and was in production but not in inventory at the time, providing plausible deniability to the military, but here is no question the means to create the gash were there in 2001.[xi]

Opportunity

After 9/11 rumors began circulating that the Shanksville gash could be seen in the 1994 USGS photo of the area, but that is a misunderstanding that is easily cleared up by comparing the 1994 photo to the 2001 shots; the gash locations, the sizes, and north-south orientations are different. [xii] Some insist grass can be seen growing in the gash, and many people still believe all it took to produce the crater was for the perpetrators to detonate a bomb in the middle of an old trench, and that they did so to cover-up for shooting down UA 93, or for executing the passengers in a NASA hangar in Cleveland.[xiii]  Other rumors were spread that the Shanksville gash was simply dug-out with heavy equipment into which they dumped scrap metal and garbage, and then dropped a bomb in the middle of that.  Recently I received a message from a local resident who said that he and his neighbors heard heavy equipment in the area the night before 9/11, and they assumed excavators were responsible for the gash, but in my opinion that makes no sense because if the perpetrators were able to create any gash they wished, then surely they wouldn’t have created one that can be reproduced with two projectiles and an explosive.  He may have heard heavy equipment moving about but I doubt they were digging out the trench; it is more likely they were moving-in the supporting cast.  Heavy equipment leaves easily identifiable marks on the ground, which weren’t visible in any of the photos.[xiv]  Furthermore if the gash had been there for years that would only increase the chances that local residents would recognize it and blow the whistle.

All of these rumors only serve to confuse the issue, and none of them can account for the evidence as found at the crash site.  It is said it is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled, and that certainly stands true for Shanksville.  The reason so many false leads were spread, was probably to lower the likelihood of investigators coming to the conclusion that the only way to explain that crater is with multiple cruise missiles.  If that happens all bets are off, because cruise missiles change everything; there are a very limited number of people who had the opportunity to use them.  As far as I can tell there are only three ways to explain it and none of them make the USA look good:

  1. Cruise missiles aren’t something a rogue element can get its hands on and then launch in American airspace without it being known by the top of the chain of command, but IF that’s what did happen then to prevent such incompetence from embarrassing the military the authorities would bend-over backwards to cover it up.
  2. If a foreign entity launched missiles on American soil under the nose of the American Military, then that is even harder to explain than a rogue element being at fault, so undoubtedly the authorities would do everything in their power to cover it up.
  3. If the missiles were launched by the USA on US soil, isn’t that considered high treason? Of course this too would be covered-up.

To admit any of the above would be to end the War on Terror and to invite war crimes trials. There is no pretty way to paint this picture and I believe that is why it was so important to the most likely suspects that investigators treat Shanksville as an inconsequential side-show.  The Shanksville crater is proof-positive that if the 9/11 attacks were not perpetrated by the US government/military against the American people, then they are too incompetent to protect America. Furthermore the evidence of missile impacts suggests that the alleged enemy nations are also involved in the cover-up, because if anybody can recognize missile impacts it would be the military minds of those nations that supposedly have every reason for exposing the fraud.

Motive, means and opportunity lead me to the conclusion that if anyone needed proof of the existence of a “New World Order,” look no further than Shanksville, Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001.

 

Steve De’ak

 

[i] Laurie Kerr, The Mosque to Commerce, Slate.com, Dec, 28 2001 http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2001/12/the_mosque_to_commerce.html (accessed July 26, 2018)

[ii] Dominic Tierney, The Twenty Years’ War, Aug. 23, 2016 https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/08/twenty-years-war/496736/ (accessed July 26, 2018)

[iii] David Shuster, 9/11 mystery: What was Flight 93’s target?, MSNBC, September 12, 2006 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14778963/ns/msnbc-hardball_with_chris_matthews/t/mystery-what-was-flight-s-target/#.W1qafMJlBhE (accessed July 26, 2018)

[iv] Elias  Davidsson, Hijacking America’s Mind On 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, 2013 p. 76, 77

[v] Gault & Wedekind, Experimental studies of oblique impact,  Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 9th, Houston, Tex., March 13-17, 1978, Proceedings. Volume 3. (A79-39253 16-91) New York, Pergamon Press, Inc., 1978, p. 3843-3875.

[vi] Steve De’ak, Taboo Truths: Uncovering Flight 93,  2018, http://yankee451.com/?p=4343 (accessed July 27, 2018)

[vii] Hurst, Avalanch Control, 1998, https://yarchive.net/explosives/avalanche.html (accessed July 27, 2018)

[viii] History Commons, Context of ‘just before 10:06 a.m. September 11, 2001: Locals Hear a Missile Before Flight 93 Crashes?” http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a1006hearmissile

[ix] Richard Wallace, 9/11: What Happened to Flight 93, August 10, 2004, https://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-what-happened-to-flight-93/685 (accessed July 28, 2018)

[x] Dave Phillips, Boeing Conducts Successful JASSM Warhead Test, 1998, http://boeing.mediaroom.com/1998-02-09-Boeing-Conducts-Successful-JASSM-Warhead-Test (accessed July 27, 2018)

[xi] US Government Accountability Office, Precision-Guided Munitions Acquisition Plans for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, June 1996, https://www.gao.gov/products/NSIAD-96-144 (accessed July 28, 2018)

 (accessed July 28, 2018)

[xii] Steve De’ak,  Google Earth Shanksville Myth, http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Google-Earth-Shanksville-Myth.png, (accessed July 28, 2018)

[xiii] 9/11 Myths, http://www.911myths.com/html/93_landed_in_cleveland.html, (accessed July28, 2018)

[xiv] Steve De’ak, Shanksville Pics, 2015, http://yankee451.com/?p=1498 (accessed July 28, 2018)

Independence Day, 9/11

For the last several years most of my time has been spent building our house, leaving precious little time for 9/11 rabble-rousing.  I do try to keep a sideways-glance at the feedback I get from my websites and YouTube channel, but for the most part ever since we began construction in 2014 my new material has been few and far between, as can be seen in the fading hit-counts.  So it was with some surprise that a 6-year old video of mine (one of my favorites) suddenly began to get a lot of attention.  Below is a screenshot of the traffic analysis showing that as of July 4th, viewership for “How the Shanksville Crater Was Made” skyrocketed, accounting for almost 70% of my total YouTube traffic:

So why now, and why this video?  Sure, it’s a good video; short, concise and relevant to today’s geo-political landscape, but as can be seen something changed.  Google has the power to bury or highlight any word or phrase from its search engines, which I assume is why the corporate behemoth is so powerful.  Individuals, businesses or nations that can afford to pony up the money can ensure that their priorities, products or ideologies will either be listed first or be buried at the bottom of search results, depending on the need.  My videos are almost always buried at the bottom of searches, even those searches that specify 9/11.

I realized long ago that fame and notoriety for my 9/11 research would never happen and it has never been about those things anyway; my goal is to discover the most-likely explanation for an event that forever changed my life, and to share what I learn with anyone who might be interested.   It’s a pity I could never break through the wall of silence built by the popular and “approved” 9/11 Truth groups, but it is what it is.  If the truth is the goal then the evidence I bring to the table (which is still ignored by the truth movement) can lead directly to the most likely explanation.  It stands to reason that it is in the best interests of the perpetrators to ensure that when Joe-citizen does a Google search for 9/11-related information those explanations that might lead to the actual truth are forever buried behind those provided by the popular truth groups, or as Lenin would call them, the leaders of the opposition.  In this way the truth movement becomes the most important part of the cover-up, thanks in large part to Google’s search engine.

But whether it was by accident or by design someone found a way to get past the censors and put 9/11 Truth at the top of Google’s search results, which I can assure you is new.  Something changed and I have the graphs to prove it, so I started doing a few quick searches to see where this new traffic was coming from.  I started searching for the usual 9/11 terms;  “9/11 Shanksville,” or “9/11 anything,” or “Shanksville Crash,” or “Flight 93 Crash,” but they all produced the usual results, with my video nowhere near the front of the pack.  But then I tried “Shanksville” alone, and lo and behold, my video popped up as the number 2 link, right behind CBS.  A few hours later it was number one.  So I turned to YouTube and searched for “Shanksville” and from what I can tell all the top hits when searching YouTube for Shanksville are for 9/11-truth related videos, with mine at the top of the pile.  Normally I would see official story related videos at the top, followed by the popular 9/11 Truth videos, but now it’s almost as if someone within Google tweaked a search filter but they only adjusted it to affect non-conspiracy searches, such as for the word “Shanksville.”

This explains the increase in traffic as well as the increase in angry comments; 9/11 Truth is an uncomfortable subject that most people are more than happy to avoid; it is an annoyance to sleepy folk who prefer to not be awakened from their slumber.  Ignorance is bliss but when non-truthers search for the word “Shanksville,” possibly hoping to find stories about the brave passengers who forced-down the jet rather than allow it to reach its target, they will be surprised and chagrined at finding my video telling them it’s all a lie.  In the comment section you can see their bubbles bursting.  I don’t know if Google got hacked by some real revolutionary out there who wants the truth to come out, or if there’s a sympathetic soul pulling strings within Google but someone found a way around the censors (if only for a short while) and I would like to applaud them for it.

Do a YouTube or Google Video search for Shanksville and see what happens, and please feel free to share.   I don’t think this will last, but for a brief moment it looks like the censors slipped.  If it was by accident or by design doesn’t really matter, but the timing is curious.  More mistakes like this one will go a long way towards waking up our slumbering neighbors, so Happy Independence Day, 9/11!

Steve