A response from an engineer

In addition to the Manhattan Craigslist ad, I posted one in Portland.


That ad has garnered several applicants, many of whom applied before they realized what they were applying for. All but one engineer/firm has balked when I gave them the details, and I expect that one will shy-away too after the principal for the firm gets involved.   I had hoped that of all people in the world, engineers would be the ones willing to speak the truth, but alas, most of them are all too willing to continue the charade.

Here is an email exchange with my latest applicant whose name has been removed:



Do you have need of an inventive engineering resource able to address

your ‘Difficult Project’ or ‘Short Term’ requirements?

If so please read on…

(followed by his resume)

My reply:


I often get folks applying who haven’t read through the material so please be sure you know what you’re getting in to.  The subject matter is controversial; if you haven’t already done so, please watch the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kn3a–hf7_s and go to http://911crashtest.com for more details.

I am looking for an engineer who can follow through quickly and produce a finite element analysis of my project within thirty days.

I have another project I’d like to tackle which I advertised in the Manhattan Craigslist:


If you can accomplish either of these within the next month or so, please let me know.


Steve De’ak

and his response:



It has always been clear to anyone with a lick of sense that 9/11 was a manufactured event.

I have chosen not to pursue any action for two reasons.


  1. If you look at the event as a ‘process’ there are,
    1. Root causes
    2. Initiation
    3. Process
    4. Results

Analyzing each element always results in a null indication of personal action. The analysis is long and arduous so I will skip the details.


  1. Even if 1 (above) indicated that some form of action was warranted mobilizing public opinion would be the least effective for all the reasons you state in your monolog.


It seems as though who ever launched 9/11 had been reading Machiavelli’s The Prince, or some other writing that condoned drastic measures to get and hold power.


As for me, I tend to think more like Rafael Sabatini.

Human kind will always have individuals that wish power and will do anything to acquire it.

Human history is circular and cyclical.

This is the batch of imperials we find ourselves living under and these are the sheeple we live with.

Although you may effect a change in the current governing mafia you will never change human nature.

It is what it is, and will fall back into the same behavioral patterns as soon as a change is made.

We just happen to be members of the nuttiest animal species ever.

What is needed is a huge sense of humor and much less drama.


With good cheer!


Fair enough, you’ll do fine, but pardon my misunderstanding, does this mean you’re willing to help me tilt windmills or not?  Are you still choosing to not pursue 9/11?  For the record, I am not trying to change human nature, only history.


Well Steve, from an engineering stand point it could be a very interesting study.

I question the value of changing history, or if it is possible in this instance.

So, I guess I must pass.


Good luck!


You can see that even the people who realize 9/11 was fake, and can prove it, are still not willing to do anything about it.  What a world.



Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *